|
|
Otolith and semicircular canal contributions to the human binocular response to roll oscillation.
Jauregui-Renaud K, Faldon M, Clarke AH, Bronstein AM, Gresty MA.
MRC HMBU, Section of Neuro-Otology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Three
normal human subjects were oscillated about their naso-occipital axis
in a supine position at 0.4 Hz and 0.1 Hz, both in darkness and in the
light with a structured fixation target. The same subjects were
oscillated in roll about an upright position, at the same frequencies,
in darkness; and also about axes directed 20 degrees and 40 degrees to
the left and to the right of the midsagittal plane, at 0.4 Hz, in
darkness. Three-dimensional binocular eye movements were recorded using
video-oculography. All stimuli induced a predominantly torsional
nystagmus with small disconjugate head-vertical (skew) and conjugate
head-horizontal components. For roll oscillation, the torsional slow
phase velocity gain was higher in the light and generally increased
with the stimulation frequency. In darkness, only one subject had
significantly higher torsional gains in the upright compared to the
supine position (12% difference), suggesting that the otolith
contribution to the roll response is minimal at the frequencies tested.
The slow phase velocity gain of the skew increased with fixation in two
subjects. but decreased in the third subject; these changes were
related to changes in eye vergence. In the upright position, with
oblique axes of rotation, the head-vertical eye movements were
asymmetrical, with the outermost eye executing a larger amplitude
movement. The disconjugate head-vertical eye movements observed can be
explained by the pattern of vertical semicircular canal stimulation and
their connections to the extraocular muscles. In humans, skewing of the
eyes may compensate for the eccentricity of the foveae which lie in the
temporal retina and undergo vertical translations in opposite
directions when the eyes tort.
|