![]() |
Freie Universität Berlin Charité University Medicine Berlin Humboldt University Berlin Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin-Buch |
![]() |
| || Home || Positions || Contact || |
|
GRK 1123: |
Cellular Mechanisms of Learning and Memory Consolidation |
This Research Training Group is funded by the German Research Council DFG
| AG Ahnert-Hilger | AG Behr | AG Geiger | AG Haucke | AG Heinemann/ Kempter |
| AG Multhaup | AG Nitsch/ Wulczyn |
AG Rosenmund | AG Schmitz/ Brecht |
AG Sigrist |
Prof. Dr. Robert Nitsch
Institut für Anatomie
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Schumannstr. 20/21
10117 Berlin
robert.nitsch@charite.de
Dr. F. Gregory Wulczyn
Institut für Anatomie
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Schumannstr. 20/21
10117 Berlin
gregory.wulczyn@charite.de
Title
miRNAs as regulators of general and local neuronal translation
Issues of the projectOne unifying feature of experimental learning and memory paradigms is that both require new protein synthesis. Furthermore, in the cases of LTP, LTD and memory consolidation, there is a critical phase dependent on protein synthesis that is subsequent to the initiating cue. The realization that both axons and dendrites contain specific miRNA populations and functional translational machinery points to the contribution of local translation and its regulatory mechanisms for synaptic plasticity. In our project, we are studying the control function of individual miRNAs for neuronal translation.
Current State of ResearchLocal translation is an attractive mechanism for the stable modification of synaptic properties in response to experience. However, to date the full contribution of local translation has not been determined for any experimental paradigm of learning or memory. Three of the best-characterized mechanisms of local translational control involve the cytoplasmic polyadenylation binding protein (CPEB), activity dependent modification of initiation factor eIF2 activity, and the action of the Fragile X Mental Retardation protein (FMRP) (reviewed in Jin et al., 2004, Sutton and Schuman, 2006, Hoeffer and Klann, 2007, Castillo et al., 2008). The first two involve activity-dependent regulation of core processes in translational initiation: 3’-5’ interactions and recruitment of initiation factors to the start site, respectively. FMRP is also subject to modulation by synaptic signals, and is an example of a site-specific mRNA-binding protein that acts as a filter for translational output.
miRNAs are new entrants into the world of translational control, but have already begun to be integrated into these established paradigms. Like CPEB, miRNAs interact with specific sequences in the 3’UTR of mRNAs to influence translation of up to 30% of all transcripts. There is increasing evidence that miRNAs recruit inhibitory proteins that compete with the translation initiation complex. This repression may be reversible, as administration of BDNF led to release of miRNA-mediated inhibition (reviewed in Ashraf and Kunes, 2006). What is more, it has been shown that FMRP interacts with miRNAs and key proteins in the miRNA biogenesis pathway, and that this interaction is essential for the regulation of synaptic plasticity by FMRP (Jin et al., 2004).
A recent study of LTM in Drosophila provided definitive evidence for miRNAs and local translation (Ashraf and Kunes, 2006). Dendritic transport and translation of the CaMKII mRNA was shown to correlate with activity at individual post-synaptic terminals. Disruption of the miRNA pathway increased mRNA delivery and synaptic translation of CaMKII, as well as other dendritic mRNAs. Furthermore, one component of the pathway, Armitage/MOV10, was subject to activity-dependent protein degradation. Interestingly, FMRP is also subject to activity dependent degradation.
One possible link between the miRNA pathway and the proteasome are members of the Trim family of E3 ubiquitin ligases, in particular the NHL subclass (reviewed in Meroni and Diez-Roux, 2005). In Drosophila and in mammals, Trim/NHL proteins have been implicated in the control of neural progenitor differentiation, the regulation of seizure susceptibility, dendritic trafficking and neurite outgrowth. Functional studies of Trim71, a recently discovered mammalian family member, have yet to be reported. Our unpublished work strongly suggests a role for Trim71, and possibly Trim2 and Trim3, in proteasome-mediated regulation of miRISC proteins such as Mov10/Armitrage, Argonautes and FMRP.
Previous work of the group
We began by characterizing the expression of an early catalog of neural miRNAs during development of the mouse brain (Smirnova et al., 2005). We then showed miRNA expression and activity was dynamically upregulated during neural differentiation due to an increase in the activity of the miRNA biogenesis pathway (Wulczyn et al., 2007). We showed that the paradigm miRNA let-7 is protected from the miRISC (the cytoplasmic protein complex responsible for miRNA maturation) in pluripotent cells by an inhibitor protein, Lin-28. (Wulczyn et al., 2007; Rybak et al., 2008). These studies revealed a conserved double-negative feedback loop involving let-7 and Lin-28 that appears to regulate stem cell commitment. The relevance of this circuit for the control of cell fate decisions, recruitment and functional maturation of the hippocampal stem cell pool is the subject of ongoing investigations in our lab.
Intracellular organization of the miRISC changes during neural differentiation; in neurons a complex containing FMRP and Argonaute supplants Lin-28. FMRP, Argonaute and other miRISC proteins display focal organization in dendrites (Wulczyn et al., 2007), encouraging us to characterize synaptosomal miRNA populations by deep sequencing (in collaboration with Ahnert-Hilger from the graduate college and Wei Chen at the MPI in Dahlem). Based on synaptic abundance, we then performed microarray profiling to identify potential target mRNAs for selected miRNAs.
One such target for let-7 is the mRNA for Trim71, a Trim/NHL domain protein. Our unpublished work strongly suggests a role for Trim71, and possibly Trim2 and Trim3, in regulating miRISC protein turnover. Combining our experience with the proteasome degradation pathway (Krappmann et al., 1996; Wulczyn et al., 1998) and synaptogenesis and plasticity (Brauer et al., 2003; Brandt et al., 2007), we will focus on the role Trim/NHL proteins play in neuronal miRNA activity.
Unlike let-7, mir-128 is exclusively present in vertebrates, is neuron-specific and enriched in the hippocampus. We have combined bioinformatic mining, microarray profiling and sensor assays to identify and validate novel mRNA targets of mir-128. These results suggest that mir-128 has a proneural role, inhibiting developmental transcription factors while inducing neurogenesis and synaptogenesis genes. As described in the Methods section, we have generated a variety of tools to investigate the role of mir-128 in the control of synaptic translation.
Objectives
The goal of this project is to investigate basic mechanisms of miRNA function as they relate to learning and memory. Our strategy is two-pronged: on the one hand we have chosen to study the role of highly conserved, universal miRNAs (let-7 and mir-125). Best studied as a developmental regulator, let-7 persists at high levels in adult neurons and comprises over 10% of the total miRNA load in the hippocampus and in synaptosomes. Virtually nothing is known about the function of let-7 in these contexts. Because of the high level of redundancy genetic approaches are currently unavailable. For this reason, we have chosen the functional analysis of let-7 target genes as the most promising route.
Similar arguments apply to mir-128: very highly expressed in hippocampal neurons and synaptosomes. Unlike let-7, no information is available from genetic studies of C. elegans or Drososphila. Here the strategy is to perturb the system from both directions: manipulating miRNA levels and examining downstream effects, and working upstream from functional investigations of target genes.
Methods
opics
Cooperation with other Members of the Graduate School
Scholarship Holder:
| AG Ahnert-Hilger | AG Behr | AG Braunewell | AG Haucke | AG Heinemann |
| AG Kempermann | AG Kempter/Schmitz | AG Kuhl | AG Multhaup | AG Nitsch |